When did the sacrifice run?
| Point | Time (UTC) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Configuration created | 2025-11-11 03:45:17 | official API |
| Window opens | 2025-11-12 00:00:00 | official API |
| First transaction on Ethereum | 2025-11-12 01:50:47, block 23,779,976 | chain |
| “Inflection” time in the points formula | 2025-12-03 00:00:00 | official API |
| Window closes | 2026-01-10 00:00:00 | official API |
The official dashboard was provex.info; the @ProveXCom account pointed sacrificers there on 2025-11-13. The domain no longer resolved on 2026-10-17, but its data interface is preserved in the Wayback Machine.
What were the terms?
The official disclaimer frames the sacrifice as a political statement — for capitalism, against middlemen, for replacing trust with proof — made with no expectation of profit from the work of others, and acknowledges that the sacrificed coins may be sold with no benefit to the sacrificer (our paraphrase). The points formula in the same configuration:
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Base rate | 10,000 points per US dollar |
| Flat bonus rate | 0.75 |
| Daily decay step | 0.0625, every 86,400 seconds |
| Volume bonus rate | 3.0 |
| Referral rate | 0.1 |
| Early sacrifices | counted |
Two cut-off fields (volumeBonusCutoff 54, flatBonusCutoff 59) are not explained in the interface, so their effect is not described here.
Which networks were accepted?
Twenty-six (interface snapshot of 2025-11-30): Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dogecoin, Dash, Zcash, Bitcoin Cash, Cardano, Ethereum, Optimism, BSC, Polygon, Monad, Sonic, PulseChain, Hyperliquid, MegaETH, Base, Plasma, Arbitrum One, Avalanche, Blast, Ripple, Stellar, Monero, Solana and Tron. Monad and MegaETH were added between 2025-11-13 and 2025-11-30. All EVM chains used one and the same sacrifice address. The portal does not print it; the first sacrifice transaction under Sources shows it.
Why did HEX, PLSX and INC earn no points?
The official tracker recorded sacrifices of HEX, HEX(eth), PLSX and INC with a value of $0 — they were accepted but earned no points. Native PLS does not appear in the tracker. Richard Heart explains this in his video as a theory: fewer sacrificers and a lower starting value from the PulseChain community would mean less selling pressure later (20:02–22:33).
How much was sacrificed?
No official final total has been found. The archived tracker gives one interim snapshot, of 2025-11-30 23:00 UTC: 7,830 sacrifices, 118,960,034,951.19 points, and a priced value of about $5.95 million. Two days later Richard Heart spoke of “like 8.5 million dollars” (00:00–00:31) — his figure. Totals reported in the press after the window closed are not confirmed by an official source and are not used here.
What does the chain show?
Inflows to the shared address inside the official window, counted from chain data. These are gross inflows in token units — not US dollars and not the official points, which also depended on the official price feed and on eligibility rules such as the $0 value for HEX, PLSX and INC. Airdropped spam tokens are left out.
Ethereum (blocks 23,779,426 → 24,200,571):
| Asset | Amount received | Transfers |
|---|---|---|
| ETH (native) | 122,141.80 (122,140.52 in transactions + 1.28 from contracts) | 7,001 + 11 |
| USDC | 4,771,506.94 | 1,830 |
| USDT | 1,394,998.02 | 494 |
| DAI | 674,652.53 | 208 |
| LINK | 22,704.36 | 70 |
| WETH | 13.97 | 25 |
| WBTC | 0.7544 | 20 |
| HEX(eth) — valued $0 | 11,109,953.28 | 25 |
PulseChain (blocks 24,998,256 → 25,488,326):
| Asset | Amount received | Transfers |
|---|---|---|
| DAI from Ethereum (bridged) | 1,528,692.33 | 638 |
| USDC from Ethereum (bridged) | 1,195,767.44 | 1,056 |
| USDT from Ethereum (bridged) | 258,892.70 | 134 |
| WETH from Ethereum (bridged) | 248.04 | 370 |
| WBTC from Ethereum (bridged) | 0.0735 | 23 |
| HEX — valued $0 | 201,591.80 | 127 |
| PLSX — valued $0 | 185,973,464 | 15 |
| INC — valued $0 | 154.84 | 5 |
| System copies (pDAI, pUSDT, pUSDC, pWETH, pWBTC) | 405,040.64 pDAI; 1,571,496.12 pUSDT; 510,083 pUSDC; 2.078 pWETH; 1.156 pWBTC | 30; 6; 4; 4; 2 |
The bridged tokens are backed by originals locked on Ethereum; the system copies are not, and the tracker shows no dollar value for them (why). Native PLS inflows and the other 24 networks were not computed; the 2025-11-30 tracker snapshot lists per-network amounts up to that date.
What happened to the funds afterwards?
On Ethereum, checked on 2026-10-19:
- ETH has not moved. The address held 122,141.872499665659206296 ETH at block 26,226,624; its only outgoing ETH transfers were two of 0.1 ETH, on 2026-01-07 and 2026-10-05.
- Stablecoins left on 2026-10-05. Between 07:16 and 07:20 UTC (blocks 26,124,617–26,124,638) the address sent 674,652.55 DAI, 1,394,998.02 USDT and 4,773,035.94 USDC — about 6.84 million in total — and then 0.1 ETH to a single receiving address. Who controls that address is not known from the chain.
- Look-alike transactions are not outflows. Since then the address shows many small incoming and outgoing token events from addresses that imitate the receiving address, with fake tokens named like ETH. This is “address poisoning” by third parties, meant to trick people into copying a wrong address — never copy an address from a transaction history.
On PulseChain, checked on 2026-10-19 (block 27,837,197):
- Part of the bridged tokens left on 2026-03-14. Between 23:05 and 23:09 UTC (blocks 26,025,204–26,025,222) the address sent 121,739 USDT, 439,624 USDC, 162,275 DAI and 134 WETH — all bridged from Ethereum — and then 1,000,000 PLS to a single receiving address. These are the only five transactions the address has sent on PulseChain. Who controls the receiving address is not known from the chain.
- The rest has not moved. The address still held 1,366,417.33 DAI, 756,165.44 USDC, 137,153.70 USDT, 114.04 WETH and 0.0735 WBTC (bridged), the HEX, PLSX and INC it received, and 341,674,045.81 PLS.
Claims by on-chain analysts about the sacrifice funds are not repeated here; they are listed as claims, with their status, on the legal timeline.